Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

This paper examines the validity of symptom information recorded at admission and at discharge in routine psychiatric case notes using two well-established instruments for criteria comparisons: the Present State Examination (PSE), a diagnostic tool which also yields severity score and the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS), an instrument suitable to measure change. In a study that compared outcome and costs of day hospital and in-patient treatments, acute psychiatric patients were randomly assigned to these two services and interviewed at different points in time by means of two rating schedules, the PSE and the CPRS. The PSE and the CPRS were applied at admission independently from the admitting doctor who reported his/her findings to the case notes, and the CPRS was used again at two weeks and at 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months from admission. To study the validity of symptom recording in routine case notes, symptom information was abstracted from the case notes at admission and at discharge and compared with these PSE and CPRS ratings, providing paired observations derived from case notes and interviews. There is a tendency to under-reporting in case notes. Symptoms are not recorded systematically at discharge and prospective studies would seek to improve availability of data. However, case notes offer an economical approach to outcome measurement if information at admission can be linked to an assessment at discharge. The present study supports the validity of symptoms recorded in case notes for use in this and open possibility for replicability.

Type

Journal article

Journal

Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria

Publication Date

01/12/2002

Volume

51

Pages

379 - 384