Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Social media (SM) research presents new challenges for research ethics committees (RECs) who must balance familiar ethical principles with new notions of public availability. This article qualitatively examines how U.K. REC members view this balance in terms of risk and consent. While it found significant variance overall, there were discernible experience-based trends. REC members with less experience of reviewing SM held inflexible notions of consent and risk that could be categorized as either relying on traditional notions of requiring direct consent, or viewing publicly available data as "fair game." More experienced REC members took a more nuanced approach to data use and consent. We conclude that the more nuanced approach should be best practice during ethical review of SM research.

Original publication

DOI

10.1177/1556264617751510

Type

Journal article

Journal

Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE

Publication Date

04/2018

Volume

13

Pages

149 - 159

Addresses

1 Lancaster University, Lancashire, UK.

Keywords

Humans, Decision Making, Research Design, Social Change, Ethical Review, Ethics Committees, Research, Social Media, United Kingdom