Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

This study set out to explore the attitudes of a representative sample of the British public towards genetic testing in children to predict disease in the future. We sought opinions about genetic testing for adult-onset conditions for which no prevention/treatment is available during childhood, and about genetic 'carrier' status to assess future reproductive risks. The study also examined participants' level of agreement with the reasons professional organisations give in favour of deferring such testing. Participants (n=2998) completed a specially designed questionnaire, distributed by email. Nearly half of the sample (47%) agreed that parents should be able to test their child for adult-onset conditions, even if there is no treatment or prevention at time of testing. This runs contrary to professional guidance about genetic testing in children. Testing for carrier status was supported by a larger proportion (60%). A child's future ability to decide for her/himself if and when to be tested was the least supported argument in favour of deferring testing.

Original publication

DOI

10.1038/ejhg.2014.221

Type

Journal article

Journal

European journal of human genetics : EJHG

Publication Date

10/2015

Volume

23

Pages

1281 - 1285

Addresses

Clinical Ethics and Law at Southampton (CELS), Academic Department of Clinical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Keywords

Humans, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Parents, Genetic Counseling, Adolescent, Adult, Middle Aged, Female, Male, Young Adult, Genetic Testing, Ethnicity