Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

BackgroundLung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death in developed countries. The prognosis is poor with only 10-15% of patients surviving 5 years after diagnosis. This dismal prognosis is attributed to the lack of efficient diagnostic methods for early detection and lack of successful treatment for metastatic disease. Within the last decade, rapid advances in molecular biology and radiology have provided a rational basis for improving early detection and patients' outcome. A non-invasive blood test effective in detecting preneoplastic changes or early lung cancer in high risk individuals has been perceived as a holy grail by cancer researchers.MethodsThe introduction of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based technology in the late 1980s and its refinement over the last 10 years have allowed us to detect and quantify extremely small amounts of tumour-derived nucleic acids. This has led to an increased knowledge of the molecular pathogenesis of lung cancer and a basis for the use of DNA and RNA markers in blood for early cancer detection, diagnostics, and follow-up. Common genetic alterations in lung carcinogenesis are already well known. We reviewed published literature on DNA and RNA in plasma or serum in lung cancer patients up to 2004, with particular emphasis on reports published since 1995.ResultsTwenty-two clinical studies have evaluating the role of DNA and RNA aberrations in the blood of lung cancer patients. A total of 1618 (range 10-163/study) cases and 595 (range 10-120/study) control cases were evaluated, and overall plasma/serum abnormalities were found in 43% (range 0-78%) of cases and 0.8% of healthy controls. For (1) total DNA and gene expression levels, 61% (range 53-71%) of cases and 0.9% of controls; (2) oncogene mutations, 16% (range 0-30%) and 0%; (3) microsatellite alterations, 46% (range 24-71%) and 21% (controls with non-malignant pulmonary disease); (4) promoter methylation, 42% (range 5-73%) and 0%; (5) tumour-related RNAs, 54% (range 39-78%) and 6%. In general, the studies contain small series of lung cancer patients and even smaller or missing case control groups.ConclusionThe analysis of circulating DNA or RNA in plasma is a promising non-invasive diagnostic tool, requiring only a limited blood sample. Its wide applicability and potential importance will possibly lead to increasing clinical impact in the near future. However, large prospective clinical studies are needed to validate and standardise any tests for DNA or RNA alteration in plasma or serum of high risk individuals or patients with established lung cancer.

Original publication

DOI

10.1016/j.lungcan.2004.12.008

Type

Journal article

Journal

Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Publication Date

07/2005

Volume

49

Pages

1 - 12

Addresses

Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Northern Norway, University of Tromsø, N-9038 Tromsø, Norway. roy_bremnes@yahoo.no

Keywords

Humans, Lung Neoplasms, DNA, Neoplasm, RNA, Neoplasm, Diagnosis, Differential, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Biomarkers, Tumor